Henri de Toulouse Lautrec
I read somewhere that Toulouse Lautrec used the pubic hairs of Paris whores to make his brushes.
While I doubt this is true, even though he may have been as clinically obsessed with getting pleasure from women of the night (and even the daylight) as countless other artists were in Paris in the 19th and 20th centuries.
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec The Medical Inspection (1894)

Notice Lautrec’s simple block signature on the lower right corner of his work.

More Paris women of the night as rendered by Lautrec
Degas
When Degas died, his brother closes his studio and removed and destroyed dozens of images of women in brothels.
Degas, Prostitute seated in an armchair (1876-1877)
“Degas’s brother René is said to have destroyed 70 pornographic sketches that were found at the time of the artist’s death. One escaped and can be seen in this exhibition. Joris-Karl Huysmans was troubled by what he saw as “scorn and loathing” for women in Degas’s work.” Germaine Greer, The Guardian, London, January 12, 2009
“He is like the painter in Zola’s novel, L’Oeuvre, who cannot stop painting his wife’s dead face because he is fascinated by the way the colour of her skin is changing. How you react to what Degas shows you is none of the artist’s concern. There can be as little doubt that Degas used prostitutes as that he used laundresses and ironing ladies. He was aware of women as independent beings, and had more respect for women artists – for Cassatt, Morisot, and Valadon, for example – than any of his contemporaries, but they were not his subject. His subject, when it is not horses, is the interaction of gentlemen and labouring women, whether dancers, prostitutes or laundresses.” Germaine Greer, The Guardian, London, January 12, 2009
Picasso’s Philosophical Brothel
Picasso’s Demoiselles d’Avignon, which he completed in the summer of 1907 represents prostitutes at night.
in Barcelona. Picasso had sixteen notebooks of sketches for this painting. Picasso owned eleven of the fifty or so extant brothel monotypes, and in his ninetieth year made a series of forty etchings that Bernheimer calls a “remarkable reading” of these visual texts
information is from the essay (The Brothel of Modernism, by Robert Scholes)
Picasso
Picasso’s Le Douleur
Picasso’s Angel Fernandez de Soto with a Woman (1902)
Egon Schiele


Nude with Green Turban (1914)
Of course you can see drawings by Egon Schiele of his sister. He had a retrospective that showed it all.

Gustave Klimpt
Klimt’s erotic drawings do not pretend they are not about lust. He leaves no doubt about his interest in representing women pleasuring themselves. Klimpt paid a heavy price for his explicitly sexual work and his work with strong sexual overtones. Over time he lost all of his Vienna nobility and state patronage, as his endless relations with prostitutes upset his collector base, who was not fond of seeing Klimpt’s sexual liason partners show up as subjects in his glorious pictures.
Klimpt (could be titled The pleasure is mines) this suite is from 1912-1914
Klimt (This series could be called A woman on the verge)
Klimpt, studio work
August Rodin’s provocative art
Marcel Duchamp

Here is Duchamp’s peephole at the Philadelphia museum, which Duchamp worked on secretly in his Greenwich Village studio, from 1946-1966, while his associates thought that he had retired from artmaking to focus on chess.

Duchamp with Eve Babitz, in preparation for an exhibition at the Pasadena Museum of Art in 1963.
Duchamp preparing for an interview with French television for his
Pasadena Museum of Art exhibition in 1963
Duchamp preparing for an interview with French television for his Pasadena Museum of Art exhibition in 1963. When is the last time an American artist has been so lauded in America, and had television coverage of his exhibition?

Courbet’s Nude (1864)
Courbet’s Origin of the World (1866)
The Musee D Orsay, Paris
Courbet painted the part of a woman’s body that the French literary giant Zola said caused the end of the French empire as men lost their minds because there were to many whores into which the fortunes of Paris were being disappeared.
One of the differences between the artists in revolt in Paris and all too many current contemporary artists,is that the Paris artists were not directly aligned with the power structure, but were critical of it, as exhibited in this work by Courbet. Consider his Burial at Ornans, which shows the burial of a pauper in a well-shaped hole in the earth. The appearance of ancestral ceremony is a fiction. Those persons surrounding the hole in the earth, where the person’s body will be dropped into, were not of the ruling or upper class, but were of the lower orders. The existence of the picture and what it portrays is a form of blasphemy of the highest order. Artists today only seek the financial reward of the market, and have all too often forgotten the miracle of art and its true magic – to offer a new and transformative vision of the world, as versus to satiate the taste of the collector class.
Edith Piaf
Edith Piaf in performance

We saw the Edith Piaf film a few years ago. When she grew up in Paris with no money, women went into prostitution in Paris like they became secretaries and teachers in the U.S. in the 1950′s. Piaf’s virtuoso singing kept her from being treated like a Yves Klein’s human female paintbrush.
I recommend everyone see this film. It is a devastating portrait of the Parisian underclass, and of the incredible life of Edith Piaf, who also suffered her own persona tragedies.


Piaf’s birthplace in Paris, in the Bellview district.
Yves Klein
Yves Klein was born in Nice, France in 1928. He died at age 34 of a heart attack in 1962. His entire explosive art career lasted a total of 8 years, yet his influence has lasted for generations.

advertisement for Le Vide exhibition
Klein’s first exhibition of was in 1950. His first truly successful exhibition was his 1957 Proposte Monochrome, Epoca Blu., at Gallerie Apollinaire in Milan. This is when he debuted his all blue paintings suite. His previous painting show had been of monochromes of different colors. The ultramarine International Klein Blue (IKB) paint he employed was invented by Klein with the assistance of a Parisian paint dealer named Edouard Adam. Klein patented this as the authenticity of the pure idea. This exhibition traveled to Paris, Düsseldorf and London. The Paris show, held in May of 1957 at the Iris Clert gallery, was a sensation. It is at this opening that Klein released 1001 blue balloons and blue postcards with Klen’s postal stamp on them were sent out for the opening. Klein’s next show at Iris Clert, in 1950, was the seminal exhibition Le Vide (The Specialization of Sensibility in the Raw Material State into Stabilized Pictorial Sensibility, The Void). It is here where guest and world-famous novelist Albert Camus wrote in the guestbook, “With The Void, Full Powers.” in 1961, Klein had a show at Leo Castelli. He sold nothing. Klein stayed at the Chelsea hotel during the show. At The Void opening in Paris on April 28, 1958 was on Klein’s birthday. Over 3,000 people attended the opening, which had received substantial press beforehand. Even though New York had by then become a global powerhouse for Contemporary Art, the Paris art market was far and away more potent in the early 1960′s. At The Void opening, which was on a Monday night, from 9PM to midnight, a blue cocktail made of gin, Cointreau and methylene blue. His guests and patrons urine was Yves Klein blue the next day.

Yves Klein Action Spectacle, March ‘, 1960, Paris

Yves Klein’s Monotone Symphony of March 9, 1960



Yves Klein Monochrome Propositions: Blue Period, Gallery Apollinaire (1957)

Klein making a painting using a blowtorch.

The audience looks as if they’re at a black tie event, but this is
just Paris being it’s ultra sophisticated self in the 1960′s.
Yves Klein: “Anthropometries of the blue period” (1960)
Yves Klein’s Petite Venus
Yves Klein’s Anthropometries
Yves Klein in his studio

Yves Klein’s Pompidou retrospective in 2007 in Paris, 45 years after his death in 1962.

Yves Klein exhibition The Blue Revolution, Vienna, Austria, 2007
Yves Klein was born in Nice, France in 1928. He died at age 34 of a heart attack in 1962. His entire explosive art career lasted a total of 8 years, yet his influence has lasted for generations.
And then there is Balthus. (Count Balthasar Klossowski de Rola, a French aristocrat with Polish blood ).

Balthus as photographed by Man Ray
Balthus self-portrait

Balthus’ Alice
Balthus’ The Guitar lesson (1934)
Balthus’ paintings always reminded me of Vladimir Nabokov’s central character Humbert Humbert in his novel Lolita.
Film director Luis Bunuel
Luis Bunuel’s Belle Du Jour (1967)
Actress Catherine Deneuve plays Severe Serizy, a well-do-do woman who is sexually frustrated. The title of the film describes both a day lilly and a woman who only works as a hooker during daylight. Severe’s inner life reveals her to be a masochist. In the opening scene, her husband Pierre has her punished for her coldness to him, by having her tied to a tree and whipped. She is then taken by both men. When the first man behind her kisses her she wakes up. The scene then reveals Severe and her husband sleep in separate beds.
Her intense sexual fantasies that she feels will not be fulfilled are a representation of the world she lives in, where women remain repressed and men find pleasure in every way in the world. One day upon an offer, Severe decides to work from 2 to 5 pm as a prostitute in a brothel. Severe realizes that most of the women are working there to support their families. She becomes involved with a young gangster who fulfills her sexual dreams. Bunuel was forced to eidt out a scene where Severe lays in a coffin for a Duke, while pretending to be his dead daughter, before Grünewal’s Christ. Out of jealousy, her husband is shot by one of her ganster lover’s associates. He is left blind and in a wheelchair. He is told by the brothel owner of his wife’s role in what happened. The film closes with Severe and her husband in love and whole, looking out of the window onto the opening scene of the film. ”The influence of Belle de Jour was quickly felt on the fashion world. This was the first time that Deneuve had been dressed by Yves Saint Laurent. She was to become his muse. As The New York Times wrote, this wasn’t just one of the most scandalous erotic films of its era. It also gave a “double life to luxury clothes so powerful that designers have fantasised about it ever since”. Geoffrey McNabb, The Independent, London, September 20, 2008
![[Belle+De+Jour+3]](http://fireplacechats.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/belledejour3.jpg?w=378&h=278)
Severe’s lover atop her, with one shoe on and one shoe off, exposing his unwashed foot with a huge hole in his worn-down sock.

A sex dream scene where Severe imagines having been tied up while half-naked, while a suitor both punishes and pleasures her.
Chantal Ackerman
Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (directed by Chantal Akerman, 1975), 35mm, 201 minutes
Chantal Ackerman’s Jeanne Dielmann is considered to be the first masterpiece of the cinema that speaks from the perspective of feminism. The film figuratively stabs back at the hateful treatment of women by men for centuries. Ackerman showed that there is a limit to which a woman will not let her dignity and humanity be stolen by the city of men and its money devouring existence.
In Jean Dielmann, the character is shown continuing to provide for her home and son, after her husband has passed away. She evidently has been a homemaker during their marriage, and as soon as funds fall short, finds herself resorting to the world’s oldest profession, and for a while she is able to endure by selling her body to male customers, while her dead-as-a-doornob son continues to expect his normal privileges of prepared dinners and money handed to him. I remember thinking how could she see the situation for what it was, that the family had to move into a poor neighborhood in Brussels, with all of their middle-class possessions, but the son acted as if nothing at all had changed,
that just because the actual economic provider for the family had passed away, that he felt zero responsibility to step in and close the gap in the family’s financial needs. After Dielmann stabs her last paid suitor, there is nothing in the film’s narrative which describes what will happen to the son, who now will be thrown to the four winds, as his mother was. Perhaps his mother being incarcerated for murder will motivate him to become gainfully employed. Or perhaps he will find himself living in an garbage can in Brussels. As this is left wide open by the narrative, there are endless possibilities to his fate, where his mother’s fate has been sealed.
There were at least one other lesser shock: That of the impoverished state of Brussels in comparison to the international mid-20th century Cool World of the Paris hipster. In much of the avant-garde cinema coming out of Paris, that city was shown to be a world filled with Gitane smoking movie stars and French Intellectuals. Ackerman showed that Brussels was not part of that world, and in fact was nothing more than a workhouse, no different from Chicago, Detroit or Cleveland as compared to New York City’s televised and published hipster culture during the same period in the United States.


Jeanne Dielmann working at home as a prostitute. One of her clients is going to pay with his life for her being lowered in this fashion by those which preceded him.
Vanessa Beecroft
The undisputed contemporary master of using nude women for their public works is the clearly fearless Italian Vanessa Beecroft.
Her work pushed back against the entire history of feminism, by showing that a woman can use women’s bodies for visual pleasure just like a man. That all of her models are both attractive and either provocatively dressed, nude, and/or in heavy costume make up only ranks up the heat on the spectacle of giving the people what they want, as an art project She gives a set of instructions to not move, not engage the audience. Each of the performances is numbered. Beecroft started out using volunteers, cheap clothes and shoes, then as her budgets grew, she turned to professional models and coutour. Her works have been described as both live paintings and live sculptures.
Prada, Manolo Blahnik, Dolce & Gabbana, Tom Ford and even Helmut Lang’s product has become part of Beecroft’s project.
It is interesting to note that the fashion world is also who is buying Marilyn Minters art and driving her career. In both instances the critique of society in both Minters and Beecroft’s work have been absorbed into the fashion world. Minter’s now does commercial work for the same fashion industry her works purportedly critiqued. Yet what is Minter to do? She has worked well over 30 years without substantive commercial and critical reward, and now that both are pouring in, this certainly is not the time to say she wanted her success to come from the critical end of the artworld. This is especially the case being that the ferocious painting marked has pushed back Conceptual Art and it’s believe system that was hammered into élite students over the past 40 plus years. Minter now has a small number of studio assistants helping her make works that she says would take a year and a half each on her own. The future will decide what Minter’s actual aesthetic achievements are, which is what all art history ultimately concerns itself with.

Marilyn Minter in her studio
“Franca Sozzani, the editor of Vogue Italia: “Fashion is important in her performances because she subdues it to her will,’ Sozzani tells me. ‘It’s not important as a logo, trend or status symbol: fashion items are used to underline the woman’s body and to express the concept behind her performances.” (Nick Johnstone, March 13, 2005, The Guardian, London.) The ‘girls’ … tableaux vivants, which are always staged twice (once for the public, once for photographing and filming.
Beecroft’s network of dealers trade in limited-edition photographs and DVD/video films of each performance.)
Maria Elena Buszek, an art historian at the Kansas City Art Institute, explains: ‘Beecroft is the veritable poster-girl for our current, third wave of feminist art history. There’s an ambivalence in her work that is present in the work of many of her contemporaries, which is the result of a culture that has both internalised feminist goals more than any generation that preceded it, and chafes against what it perceives as feminism’s restraints.” (Nick Johnstone, March 13, 2005, The Guardian, London.)



Vanessa Beecroft exhibition, ICA London, 2007

VB 64 was held at Deitch Projects Long Island City studios, 2009

I decided to provide one example of art photography whose subject is poverty and prostitution
Eugene Atget, documented the disappearing architecture of Paris’ Ancien Regime and in this moment photographed a prostitute in Paris

Motel Grand. Los Angeles. by Vincent Johnson (2002)
Spectacular New Cosmos Suite Paintings by Vincent Johnson (Numbers 4, 5, 6 large)
Three new paintings are added to the Cosmos Suite by Vincent Johnson on 2.24.2013. These are the 7th, 8th and 9th paintings created in the Cosmos Suite. They are also the 4th, 5th and 6th large scale paintings in this body of work.
These Cosmos Suite paintings by Los Angeles base artist Vincent Johnson are created using various experiments in media and paint application. Johnson has done substantial research into the area of the history of painting materials and there use, and employs this knowledge in the production of his work.
There are now a total of nine paintings in the Cosmos Suite. Six of the nine paintings are thirty by forty inches in size. Three of the paintings – the originals in the suite, are twenty by twenty four inches in size. Each painting takes about a month to create as there is a three week drying time between the first and second layers of the painting. As the suite grows there will be additional sizes including larger works.

Cosmos Suite: A Meeting Between Two Figures in Space
Large areas of vertical yellow in painting. Layered canvas in thick paint in certain areas. Reminds me of seeing Gerhard Richter’s painting retrospective in London in the fall of 2011.

Cosmos Suite: State and Grace
Used sponges on face of painting. Layered canvas in thick paint.
Shape is of Florida in part

used sponges on side and surface of the painting. used large brushwork. Layered canvas in paint.
Sensing jazz standards here – floating fields of opulent pure romantic color
New Abstract Paintings: The Cosmos suite (2012)

Golden Dream (2012), part of the Cosmos Suite of paintings

- California Toilet, Filthy Light Switch (2010) by Vincent Johnson. Archival Epson print (Private Collection, Miami, Florida). I provided this image as I realized its clear similarity to Golden Dream, which I completed a week ago in my studio in Los Angeles.
Two at Night (2012) from the Cosmos suite of paintings, Oil on canvas, 30×40 inches

Vincent Johnson is an artist and writer in Los Angeles
LANYArtiststudio@gmail.com
http://www.vincentjohnsonart.com

































Pingback: Notes on Raunchy Art – both Painting and Conceptual Art History … | Hero J's Blog, Network Integration Solutionser.
What a very interesting article! I didn’t know that Degas’ brother destroyed a bunch of his work after his death!
Pingback: Notes on Raunchy Art – both Painting and Conceptual Art History … « Oil Painting Boutique Blog
very artistic I love it
Sidra Stichs essay in the Hayward Gallery catalogue pulls the threads together but into a ball of string rather than a fabric – nothing really new is added and despite the benefits of accumulated prior research no real sense of what made Klein tick emerges from the weight of the text…As for the work itself the Monochromes the Sponge Reliefs and the Anthropometries have been so thoroughly dissected that there seems little more to say about them except that for some reason many of the examples at the Hayward Gallery were looking a little worse for wear. While there are very real concerns about the fragility of much of Kleins work and hence difficulties in persuading owners to allow its transportation it seems a pity that the artist of the immaterial should be represented by works that are slowly oxidising like the darkened edges of an old cheese slice. I suppose we just have to imagine..Something that tends to be forgotten about Klein is the controversy his work produced at the time it was exhibited.
Sidra Stichs essay in the Hayward Gallery catalogue pulls the threads together but into a ball of string rather than a fabric – nothing really new is added and despite the benefits of accumulated prior research no real sense of what made Klein tick emerges from the weight of the text…As for the work itself the Monochromes the Sponge Reliefs and the Anthropometries have been so thoroughly dissected that there seems little more to say about them except that for some reason many of the examples at the Hayward Gallery were looking a little worse for wear. While there are very real concerns about the fragility of much of Kleins work and hence difficulties in persuading owners to allow its transportation it seems a pity that the artist of the immaterial should be represented by works that are slowly oxidising like the darkened edges of an old cheese slice. I suppose we just have to imagine..Something that tends to be forgotten about Klein is the controversy his work produced at the time it was exhibited.
The rise of European cinema was interrupted by the outbreak of World War I when the film industry in United States flourished with the rise of Hollywood, typified most prominently by the great innovative work of D. W. Griffith in The Birth of a Nation (1914) and Intolerance (1916). However in the 1920s, European filmmakers such http://www.kiwata.com/images/film/category1.html as Sergei Eisenstein, F. W. Murnau, and Fritz Lang, in many ways inspired by the meteoric war-time progress of film through Griffith, along with the contributions of Charles Chaplin, Buster Keaton and others, quickly caught up with American film-making and continued to further advance the medium. In the 1920s, new technology allowed filmmakers to attach to each film a soundtrack of speech, music and sound effects synchronized with the action on the screen. These sound films were initially distinguished by calling them “talking pictures”, or talkies.
The next major step in the development of cinema was the introduction of so-called “natural color”, which meant color that was http://www.kiwata.com/images/film/category2.html photographically recorded from nature rather than being added to black-and-white prints by hand-coloring, stencil-coloring or other arbitrary procedures, although the earliest processes typically yielded colors which were far from “natural” in appearance. While the addition of sound quickly eclipsed silent film and theater musicians, color replaced black-and-white much more gradually. The pivotal innovation was the introduction of the three-strip version of the Technicolor process, which was first used for short subjects and for isolated sequences in a few feature-length films released in 1934, then for an entire feature film, Becky Sharp, in 1935. The expense of the process was daunting, but continued favorable public response and enhanced http://www.kiwata.com/images/film/category3.html box-office receipts increasingly justified the added cost. The number of films made in color slowly increased year after year.
In the early 1950s, as the proliferation of black-and-white television started seriously depressing theater attendance in the US, the use of color was seen as one way of winning back audiences. It soon became the rule rather than the exception. Some important mainstream Hollywood films were still being made in black-and-white as late as the mid-1960s, but they marked the end of an era. Color television receivers had been available in the US since the mid-1950s, but at first they were very expensive http://www.kiwata.com/images/film/category4.html and few broadcasts were in color. During the 1960s, prices gradually came down, color broadcasts became common, and the sale of color television sets boomed. The strong preference of the general public for color was obvious. After the final flurry of black-and-white film releases in mid-decade, all major Hollywood studio film production was exclusively in color, with rare exceptions reluctantly made only at the insistence of “star” directors such as Peter Bogdanovich and Martin Scorsese.
Since the decline of the studio system in the 1960s, the succeeding decades saw changes in the production and style of film. Various New Wave movements (including the French New Wave, Indian New Wave, Japanese New Wave and New Hollywood) and the rise of film school educated independent filmmakers were all part of the changes the medium http://www.kiwata.com/images/film/category5.html experienced in the latter half of the 20th century. Digital technology has been the driving force in change throughout the 1990s and into the 2000s.Film criticism is the analysis and evaluation of films. In general, these works can be divided into two categories: academic criticism by film scholars and journalistic film criticism that appears regularly in newspapers and other media.
Film critics working for newspapers, magazines, and broadcast media mainly review new releases. Normally they only see any given film once and have only a day or two to formulate http://www.kiwata.com/images/film/category6.html opinions. Despite this, critics have an important impact on films, especially those of certain genres. Mass marketed action, horror, and comedy films tend not to be greatly affected by a critic’s overall judgment of a film. The plot summary and description of a film that makes up the majority of any film review can still have an important impact on whether people decide to see a film. For prestige films such as most dramas, the influence of reviews is extremely important. Poor reviews will often doom a film to obscurity and financial loss.
The impact of a reviewer on a given film’s box office performance is a matter of debate. Some claim that movie marketing is now so intense and well financed that reviewers cannot make an impact against it. However, the cataclysmic failure of some heavily promoted movies which were harshly reviewed, as well as the unexpected success of critically praised independent movies indicates that extreme critical reactions can have http://www.kiwata.com/images/film/category7.html considerable influence. Others note that positive film reviews have been shown to spark interest in little-known films. Conversely, there have been several films in which film companies have so little confidence that they refuse to give reviewers an advanced viewing to avoid widespread panning of the film. However, this usually backfires as reviewers are wise to the tactic and warn the public that the film may not be worth seeing and the films often do poorly as a result.
It is argued that journalist film critics should only be known as film reviewers, and true film critics are those who take a more academic approach to films. This line of work is more often known as film theory or film studies. These film critics attempt to come to understand how film and filming techniques work, and what effect they have on people. Rather than having their works published http://www.kiwata.com/images/film/category8.html in newspapers or appear on television, their articles are published in scholarly journals, or sometimes in up-market magazines. They also tend to be affiliated with colleges or universities.The making and showing of motion pictures became a source of profit almost as soon as the process was invented. Upon seeing how successful their new invention, and its product, was in their native France, the Lumières quickly set about touring the Continent to exhibit the first films privately to royalty and publicly to the masses. In each country, they would normally add new, local scenes to their catalogue and, quickly enough, found local entrepreneurs in the various countries of Europe to buy their equipment and photograph, export, import and screen additional product commercially. The Oberammergau Passion Play of 1898[citation needed] was the first commercial motion picture ever produced. Other pictures soon followed, and motion pictures became a separate industry that overshadowed the vaudeville world. Dedicated http://www.kiwata.com/images/film/category9.html theaters and companies formed specifically to produce and distribute films, while motion picture actors became major celebrities and commanded huge fees for their performances. By 1917 Charlie Chaplin had a contract that called for an annual salary of one million dollars.
From 1931 to 1956, film was also the only image storage and playback system for television programming until the introduction of videotape recorders.
In the United States today, much of the film industry is centered around Hollywood. Other regional centers exist in many parts of the world, such as Mumbai-centered Bollywood, the Indian film industry’s Hindi cinema which produces the largest number of films in the world.[2] Whether the ten thousand-plus feature length films a year produced by the Valley pornographic film industry should qualify for this title is the source of some debate.[citation needed] Though the expense involved in making movies has led cinema production to concentrate under http://www.kiwata.com/images/film/index.html the auspices of movie studios, recent advances in affordable film making equipment have allowed independent film productions to flourish.
Profit is a key force in the industry, due to the costly and risky nature of filmmaking; many films have large cost overruns, a notorious example being Kevin Costner’s Waterworld. Yet many filmmakers strive to create works of lasting social significance. The Academy Awards (also known as “the Oscars”) are the most prominent film awards in the United States, providing recognition each year to films, ostensibly based on their artistic merits.
There is also a large industry for educational and instructional films made in lieu of or in addition to lectures and texts.
Pingback: Toulouse-Lautrec notice · WWW.MINFOWIZ.COM